基本内容摘自网络
Michael Pezzullo表示政府将会利用广泛的数据资源来分析潜在移民的生活习惯,以审查和判断他们是否有可能适应并按照澳洲价值观来生活,其中包括了是否能融入社会、尊重性别平等、言论自由和宗教自由,也就是政府常常挂在嘴边的所谓澳洲价值观的内容。
如果真的对有意向入籍的移民进行持续的审查,全过程会大致分为三个阶段:来澳洲之前、在澳洲期间和递交了入籍申请后这段时间。Michael Pezzullo相信通过这种方式能防止申请人只是为了应付入籍考试而随意捏造答案。
目前政府内部已经在积极讨论此项计划,下一步就会是提交到议会,这个对潜在入籍的移民的持续审查计划会适用于所有国家的申请者。Michael Pezzullo当然否认这是专门针对非白人而设置的门槛,“这也帮助防止极端主义分子偷偷潜入澳洲。”
上周三他再一次重申政府提高入籍要求的决心,“我可以向你确认,政府仍然在致力于推进这一项改革。
他表示联盟党政府更倾向于看到绿党和工党改变立场,“如果他们不妥协,我相信公民和多元文化事务部部长Alan Tudge能通过与中立议员的谈判获得一个结果。”
去年阻挠旧入籍修改法案通过的关键NXT色诺芬团队,因双国籍的风波他们损失了一名参议员的位置,从3票减少到2票。
不管怎样,David Leyonhjelm不久前还提出了一个更加激进的计划,极端严格审查入籍申请者,并且只有公民才能享受澳洲的福利。(记得笔者一直以来跟广大客户所警告的吗?)
“通过了价值观考试,成为澳洲公民的人,才能够享受澳洲的福利。提高入籍的门槛能增加澳洲人对移民的认同度,毕竟澳洲社会福利保障系统实际上花的都澳洲纳税人的钱。”
他还自己设计了15道测试澳洲价值观的问题,大家仔细阅读,看看是否对号入座↓↓↓
1. Should there be a law banning slavery?
2. Should tax obligations differ depending on a person’s religion?
3. Should there be a law banning female circumcision?
4. Should there be a law banning women from:
– voting?
– being elected to government?
– driving?
– showing her head hair, arms or legs in public?
5. Should there be a law banning a husband from:
– hitting his wife?
– having sex with his wife without the wife’s consent?
6. Should there be a law banning a wife from:
– leaving the home against the wishes of the husband?
– driving against the wishes of the husband?
– showing her head hair, arms or legs in public against the wishes of the husband?
7. Should there be a law banning adults from:
– drinking alcohol?
– gambling?
– having sex with a child?
– having sex outside marriage?
– holding hands or kissing someone of the same sex in public?
– homosexual acts and relationships?
– owning or viewing pornography?
8. Should there be a law banning children being married?
9. Should there be a law banning a person from refusing to marry according to a parent’s instruction?
10. Should there be a law banning divorce?
11. Where a mother and father of a child are not married, should there be a law granting custody to the father?
12. Should there be a law giving preference to men over women regarding the receipt of inheritances?
13. Should there be a law banning the schooling of boys and girls in the same class room?
14. Should there be a law banning:
– the charging of interest on loans?
– people abandoning their religion?
– blasphemy?
15. Should the punishment for killing be reduced if the killer says it was done for family honour?
该项提议较为激进,大家心知肚明主要针对的对象。虽然目前看来没有什么建设性的意义,例如白左集中营Australian Council of Social Services的CEO就对这项计划嗤之以鼻,“这会破坏澳洲整个社会保障网络,像是把澳洲拉回到上世纪初!”,但是,在整个西方社会总体上静悄悄“向右转”的趋势下,难道普通民众的确愿意继续让传统西方价值观被丢弃、被淹没,传统基督教价值理念全面崩溃,让位于同现代文明格格不入的YSL文化以及“违禁词”、“敏感词”文化吗?
锦程移民诚挚奉劝大家:要移民、请趁早;想入籍、先换脑。什么意思呢?如果脑筋转不过弯来,就像那些MSL难民、移民一样,来了以后还想把原来的价值观带到澳洲来,甚至妄图“反客为主”,意图做“第五纵队”、推翻西方传统文化和价值观所根植的土壤,把自己那套强加给无私接收你的移民国度的话,只恐怕最后就是“搬起石头砸自己的脚”,连个退路都没有。“世界潮流、浩浩汤汤;顺之者昌、逆之者亡”。如果真的不认同西方价值观,那么最好的出路就是从哪里来回哪里去,“憋着一口气”活在一个心里不舒坦的地方,恐怕只会惹出精神疾患来。当然,对于那些吃里扒外、见风使舵、毫无廉耻之徒,一边享受着西方国家的超好社会福利,一边对西方传统价值观、普世价值观、宪政民主唱反调、热泪盈眶思念“违禁词”、“敏感词”文化的那些粉红战狼义和团品种,我们也只能说一句:好自为之吧!